dlqssopendoc
LAST UPDATED: 10 JULY 2019
Contact Us
<<<<<<< HEAD
=======
>>>>>>> 4b65f29a1fae06d9da704c4a5a994a26ab8d3605
URU v URV
search entire site
dlqssopendoc
Mohamed Affandi bin Rosli v Public Prosecutor and another appeal
UKM v Attorney-General
ULA v UKZ
UMF v UMG and another
TWD and another v UQE
URU v URV
Sun Electric Pte Ltd and another v Menrva Solutions Pte Ltd and another
Aero-Gate Pte Ltd v Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nabill bin Mohd Fuad
Huang Ying-Chun v Public Prosecutor
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 901 v Lian Tat Huat Trading Pte Ltd
Sabyasachi Mukherjee and another v Pradeepto Kumar Biswas and another suit
Haw Wan Sin David and another v Sim Tee Meng and another
Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v ERC Unicampus Pte Ltd
Tan Li Yin Michel v Avril Rengasamy
BAZ v BBA and others and other matters
BUE and another v TZQ and another
P & P Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd v Kori Construction (S) Pte Ltd
RJC Resource Pte Ltd and another v Koh Lee Hoo
Public Prosecutor v Tangaraju s/o Suppiah
Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong and another
Docu ment2
Part XIX: Matrimonial Proceedings and Matters Relating To The Guardianship of Infants
Document2_nicer_name
Back to Documents
WEW
Mohamed Affandi bin Rosli
v
Public Prosecutor and another appeal
Introduction
Background
The parties’ cases
Our decision
Conclusion
Introduction
The parties’ cases at the trial
The appeals
Issues to be determined
My decision
Conclusion
UKM
v
Attorney-General
Introduction
Background
The decision below
The parties’ cases on appeal
The issues raised and our analytical approach
Issue 1: The welfare of the Child
Issue 2: The legal basis for taking public policy considerations into account
Issue 3: Taking public policy into account
Issue 4: Payment under s 11 of the Act
Applying Step 2: Balancing the Child’s welfare and public policy
Conclusion
ULA
v
UKZ
Introduction
Facts
The Mother’s case
The Father’s case
The District Judge’s decision
The law on relocation
My decision
Conclusion
UMF
v
UMG and another
Introduction
Background facts
Decision below
Parties’ arguments
Issues
Decision
Law reform
Conclusion
TWD and another
v
UQE
Facts
The decision below
The parties’ arguments
The YAC’s submissions and the parties’ further submissions
The issue
My decision
Conclusion
URU
v
URV
Introduction
Background facts
Appellant’s submissions
Amicus curiae’s submissions
Decision
Summary and conclusion
Sun Electric Pte Ltd and another
v
Menrva Solutions Pte Ltd and another
The background
Issues to be determined
Preliminary issue on pleadings
The claim in contract
The claim in tort
Lifting the corporate veil
The
alter ego
ground as an independent ground
The counterclaim
Conclusion
Aero-Gate Pte Ltd
v
Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd
Introduction
Background facts
The contempt proceedings
Applicable principles of law
The O 52 r 2(2) statements
Liability
Sentence
Costs
Conclusion
Public Prosecutor
v
Muhammad Nabill bin Mohd Fuad
Introduction
The Prosecution’s case
Close of the Prosecution’s case
Nabill’s case
The law
Decision on conviction
Decision on sentence
Huang Ying-Chun
v
Public Prosecutor
Introduction
The material facts
Decision below
Parties’ cases in this appeal
Issues to be determined
Issue 1: A sentencing framework should be adopted
Issue 2: The sentencing framework to be adopted
Issue 3: The five-step framework
Issue 4: Application of the sentencing framework to the present case
Conclusion
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 901
v
Lian Tat Huat Trading Pte Ltd
Introduction
Background
Parties’ cases
Issues to be determined
The law on striking out
Preliminary issue of whether Prayer 1 should be struck out by reason of subsequent events
Whether the defendant was the proper party to OS 1337
Whether By-law 66 was valid and enforceable
Conclusion
Sabyasachi Mukherjee and another
v
Pradeepto Kumar Biswas and another suit
Introduction
Suit 1270/2014
Overview of Suit 1270/2014
Relationship between the Mukherjee and Pradeepto
Whether Pradeepto was a fiduciary
Issue 1: Cause of action based on breach of fiduciary duty
Issue 2: Cause of action based on the tort of deceit
Conclusion on Suit 1270/2014
Suit 417/2017
Conclusion on Suit 417/2017
Haw Wan Sin David and another
v
Sim Tee Meng and another
The facts
The District Judge’s findings and decision
Parties’ cases
Issues to be decided
Whether Jimmy Sim made Representations 4 to 6
Whether Jimmy Sim owes a personal duty of care to the appellants
Whether Belle Seah owes a personal duty of care to the appellants
Whether Belle Seah breached her duty of care to the appellants
Conclusion
Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation)
v
ERC Unicampus Pte Ltd
Introduction
Facts
GREIH’s case
Whether ERCU is estopped from challenging the S1098 Findings
ERCU’s liability as a knowing recipient
Scope of an account of profits by ERCU
RA 377
Conclusion
Tan Li Yin Michel
v
Avril Rengasamy
Introduction
Background to the dispute
The parties’ cases
The decision below
The parties’ arguments in the appeal
Issues to be determined
Conclusion
BAZ
v
BBA and others and other matters
Introduction
The ICC Arbitration and the Award
Enforcement proceedings in India
Grounds of setting aside in OS 784 and OS 787
Summary of parties’ positions in OS 784 and OS 787
Issue 1: Whether the doctrine of issue estoppel arises from the DHC Judgment
Issue 2: Whether the extended doctrine of
res judicata
or waiver are applicable
The extended doctrine of
res judicata
in arbitration
Issue 3: Whether the Majority had exceeded the powers conferred on them by the Arbitration Agreement
Issue 4: Whether time limitation is a jurisdictional issue
Issue 5: Natural justice
Issue 6: Public policy
Conclusion
BUE and another
v
TZQ and another
Introduction
Background
The preliminary issue
The material facts
The parties’ cases
My decision
Conclusion
P & P Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd
v
Kori Construction (S) Pte Ltd
Introduction
Background
The issues
Costs in relation to PPE’s claim under the manpower contract
Kori’s counterclaim
Costs
RJC Resource Pte Ltd and another
v
Koh Lee Hoo
Introduction
Summary of plaintiffs’ claims
Summary of defendant’s defence
31 May 2013 Agreement
Summary of evidence led at trial
Issues for determination
The analysis
Peripheral issues
Conclusion
Public Prosecutor
v
Tangaraju s/o Suppiah
Introduction
The Prosecution’s case
Close of the Prosecution’s case
The defence
Decision on conviction
Decision on sentence
Moh Tai Siang
v
Moh Tai Tong and another
Introduction
Background
Plaintiff’s case
1st defendant’s case
2nd defendant’s case
The decision
Analysis
Pleadings
Evidence about the family’s practices
Whether the Indenture was a genuine conveyance
Whether a resulting trust arose
Constructive trust and knowing receipt
The effect of the Deed of Confirmation
Unjust enrichment
Peripheral matters
Conclusion
Getting started
Prerequisites
Instructions
Configuring Github Pages
Readme
I. Make a fork of bare
II. Set up GitHub pages
III. Set your push webhook
IV. Copy your markdown documents into your local repo
V. Modify the config file
VI. Push your changes to production
Bachmeer Capital Limited
v
Ong Chih Ching and others
Introduction
Background
The claims and counterclaims in the present suit
Evidence adduced at trial
List of issues for determination
My decision
Conclusion on the claims and counterclaims
Costs
APPENDIX A: LIST OF ISSUES
A. PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
(i) The relationship between the parties
(ii) The 20 May Agreement and its effect (or lack thereof)
B. THE DEFENDANTS’ DEFENCE AND/OR COUNTERCLAIMS
(iv) Defamation
Using Markdown
Formatting your Text
Organising your Content
Adding Media Enhancements
Contribute
Give us your feedback
Import your files
Introduction
Features
Important concepts
References
Getting started
Prerequisites
Instructions
Configuring Github Pages
Introduction
Features
Important concepts
References
Readme
I. Make a fork of bare
II. Set up GitHub pages
III. Set your push webhook
IV. Copy your markdown documents into your local repo
V. Modify the config file
VI. Push your changes to production
Using Markdown
Formatting your Text
Organising your Content
Adding Media Enhancements
URU v URV
[2018] SGHCF 22 / Decision Date: 28 December 2018
Toggle Sidebar
Save as PDF
View on Github
Feedback
Share
Save as PDF
View on Github
Start by searching or selecting a document to browse
Start Browsing
Powered by
